A new class proposed for the RAN

Whats been spotted in and around our Navy
Post Reply
User avatar
MikeJames
Club Member
Club Member
Posts: 4935
Joined: 20 Jan 2010 09:43
Fleet Base: Sydney
My Ship Yard: RAN DDL HMAS Kokoda
Australian Coast Guard cutter Nemesis
RAN FCPB HMAS Wollongong
German SAR Launch DGzRS Berln
SS Geest Atlas (Building)
Location: Sydney
Contact:

A new class proposed for the RAN

Post by MikeJames »

The sharks (shipbuilders) smell blood (money) in the water.

First Navantia, now Luerssen is proposing new ships for the RAN.

Defence eyes $5bn corvette-style warship fleet

Image
A corvette of the K130-class provided to the German Navy. Picture: Getty Images

EXCLUSIVE BEN PACKHAM
FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND DEFENCE CORRESPONDENT
@bennpackham

CAMERON STEWART
ASSOCIATE EDITOR
@camstewarttheoz

OCTOBER 9, 2022
A high-level Defence review is looking at acquiring a new fleet of small but powerful warships to give the navy a rapid firepower boost in response to growing strategic threats.

The Australian can reveal 10 to 12 of the corvette-style ships, armed with missiles, canons, and potentially anti-submarine ­tor­pedoes, are being considered for a total price tag of about $5bn-$6bn.

The move comes amid a growing realisation in Defence that the navy’s lightly armed offshore ­patrol boats being delivered by German shipbuilder Luerssen are no longer sufficient, given the ­surging strength of the Chinese navy and its “grey zone” maritime militia.

The Albanese government’s defence strategic review, chaired by former defence minister Stephen Smith and ­former defence chief Sir Angus Houston, is looking at the corvette option to provide the navy with greater “mass” to guard the nation’s sea lanes and keep the Southwest Pacific free of maritime coercion.

Luerssen has two corvette designs – the K130-class provided to the German Navy, and the C90 purchased by Bulgaria – which are being examined by the review team.

Both vessels are about 10m longer than the 80m Arafura-class offshore patrol vessels, and come armed with surface-to-air and ­surface-to-surface missiles, and multiple medium-calibre guns.

The C90 also has anti-submarine warfare capabilities.

Converting the OPVs into ­corvette-style vessels by arming them with missiles is also an ­option, although the vessels could potentially be transferred to ­Border Force.

“The reality is, the strategic situation when the offshore patrol boats were selected in 2017 is different from the strategic situation now,” one source said.

“Defence is looking at other options to get capability faster and these (corvettes), compared to the OPVs, are longer, heavier and well-armed – they are a surface combatant, not a constabulary vessel.”

The first corvette could be completed by 2028, with additional vessels rolling off the production line every 10 months.

The vessels could be built ­entirely in Australia, most likely in Western Australia, or they could be a hybrid construction project shared between Luerssen’s shipyards in Germany and Australia.

The cost of the vessels could be as low as $500m a ship, which would make the project sub­stantially cheaper than the much larger naval ­programs to build new frigates and nuclear-powered submarines.

Luerssen has launched the first of a scheduled 12 OPVs and a second will be completed in coming months.

The total cost of the contract is sitting at about $3.6bn.

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s Marcus Hellyer said the smaller warships should be seriously considered.

“The (2020) Defence Strategic Update said we need greater ­lethality and we need it quickly,” he said.

“Up-gunning the OPV is the fastest and most cost-effective way to do that.

“It will deliver a real maritime capability boost years before the first Hunter-class frigate arrives.”

He said if the government wanted fill the capability gap before Australia’s nuclear submarines arrived, then “we also need to consider long-range strike ­options like the US Air Force’s B-21 bomber”.

The proposed corvettes would complement, not replace, the $45bn plan to build nine of the much larger Hunter-Class frigates, which will enter service from the early-2030s.

They are considered a more likely option than building three additional air warfare destroyers, which Spanish shipbuilder Navantia has proposed in an unsolicited plan it says would cost about $6bn.

Some industry sources dispute the forecast cost of the 7000t AWDs, and warn that building them in Australia would sap the Hunter-class frigate program of skilled workers.

Defence Minister Richard Marles has previously told The Australian that the review would also consider the purchase of extra F-35A joint strike fighters, and the potential acquisition of the in-development B21.

It’s believed it is also looking at whether to hold on to the army’s troubled MRH-90 Taipans instead of replacing them with US Black Hawks, as flagged by the Coalition, and the need to rapidly acquire armed drones and loitering munitions.

Mr Smith and Sir Angus will deliver a secret interim report to the government by November 1 ahead of a final report in March.

That will coincide with the final report of the government’s ­nuclear submarine task force.

END

Given a choice, I'd take more AWDs, even instead of Hunters, than these short ranged, ASW and AAW deficient vessels. They could fit out the Arafura's with a decent gun and SSMs and get 60% of the capability discussed here for peanuts
rritchie71
Committee
Committee
Posts: 896
Joined: 27 Jan 2010 12:59
Fleet Base: Perth
My Ship Yard: HMAS Adelaide (LHD), USS Roosevelt, USS Anzio, RFS Peter the Great, Scharnhorst, HMAS Melbourne, HMAS Sydney (AWD), ITS Carlo Bergamini, HNLMS Evertsen, HMS Middelton, HMS Severn, RFS Arkangelsk, Fairplay 30, Normand Master, Fure West

Re: A new class proposed for the RAN

Post by rritchie71 »

The K130 class has done very well for Germany, I’m slowly building a model of the FGS Koln which is the first of the K130 Batch II’s. If they are considering these, you would assume it will not detract from thoughts or plans for more destroyers or other ships, because they have a different purpose.

They are great ships, well armed, with a shallow draft and shorter range for coastal work, although they frequently pop up in the Gulf for anti-piracy work and are rather effective. They would free up destroyers and frigates for other work more than the Arafura’s could in their planned config, whilst having a punch.

Robert
Attachments
Korvette Köln
Korvette Köln
User avatar
MikeJames
Club Member
Club Member
Posts: 4935
Joined: 20 Jan 2010 09:43
Fleet Base: Sydney
My Ship Yard: RAN DDL HMAS Kokoda
Australian Coast Guard cutter Nemesis
RAN FCPB HMAS Wollongong
German SAR Launch DGzRS Berln
SS Geest Atlas (Building)
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: A new class proposed for the RAN

Post by MikeJames »

Apparently, there is some rethinking going on in Canberra about the Arafura's configuration.

Inside Defence there are concerns that the lightly armed Lürssen OPV may not be sufficient for the Indo-Pacific region where the military environment is increasingly contested, including the presence of China's maritime militia is growing.

"It's late, has next-to-no armament, a helicopter platform that is not strong enough for helicopters, it isn't seaworthy and there are safety standard issues," one figure familiar with defence department deliberations has told the ABC.

The government has yet to comment publicly on the schedule delays and problems emerging on the OPV project which could be reduced as part of the Defence Strategic Review that's due to report in March.

Alternatively, the government could face the invidious choice of attempting to shoehorn more weapons onto the small OPV platform, or purchasing a better suited and larger Corvette design, meaning existing OPVs would be transferred from the Navy to the Australia Border Force.​


'Shoehorning more weapons' is apparently ABC speak for equipping the Arafura's in a similar fashion to the Royal Brunei Navy's Darusallam class sisters to the Arafura's.

Journalists, I swear some of them make a virtue of their ignorance.

Mike
Post Reply